Icon Icon Icon Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Icon

live under tech

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Friday, August 29, 2014

Samsung Gear S vs. LG G Watch R

Samsung Gear S vs. LG G Watch R



Smartwatches have yet to really take off, but this holiday season is going to mark the biggest push we've seen from OEMs. Ahead of IFA 2014, Samsung and LG have already spilled the beans on their upcoming flagship watches. Read on, as Gizmag compares the features and specs of theSamsung Gear S and LG G Watch R smartwatches.

Size

Dimensions (still unknown for the G Watch R)
LG hasn't yet listed the dimensions for the G Watch R, but the images in this post should (roughly) reflect the watches' relative sizes. We sized them based on their screen diagonals.

Standalone wireless

The Gear S has standalone 3G wireless capabilities – no phone required
The Gear S is the first mainstream smartwatch we've seen that can work its mojo without a paired phone. With its built-in 3G connectivity (sorry, guys, no LTE), a SIM card should make the Gear S one of the smartest watches we've seen.
The Gear S can also pair with a phone, but we're still fishing for details on a) exactly which phones it's compatible with (likely Samsung only), and b) whether any features will be disabled when you're using the watch on its own. We'll update when we find out more.

Display (shape)

Display shape
If you're looking for the G Watch R's killer feature, look no further. This holiday season, LG's watch is going to do battle with the Moto 360 for the hearts of those lusting after round smartwatch displays.
Meanwhile, the Gear S has a curved rectangular display. We haven't yet handled it in person, but it looks like a larger version of the Gear Fit'sscreen – and I was a fan of its sleek design.

Display (size)

Display size (diagonal below, percentage of area in red)
While the G Watch R is going to look more like a classic watch, there are advantages to the Gear S' more tech producty look. Namely, it gives you 44 percent more screen real estate.

Display (resolution)

Display resolution and pixel density
Both watches' screens should look fairly sharp, but the Gear appears to have the advantage. It comes in at 300 pixels per inch (PPI) and, unless our calculations are off (the abacus is still in the shop), the G Watch R packs in a not-as-sharp 246 PPI.

Display (type)

Display type
The G Watch R is using the same P-OLED display tech found in the G Flex phablet. LG says that the screen will provide "stunning image clarity even under bright sunlight." We'll have to wait to see if that's the case, as the first two Android Wear watches had some issues with visibility under direct sunlight.

Software

Software platforms
Another big difference here is that we're looking at Samsung's wearable version of Tizen OS, next to Google's Android Wear.
In previous watches, we preferred Wear's superior voice control and more direct integration with Android apps. But Samsung is updating its platform for the Gear S, so we won't leap to conclusions until we get some hands-on time.

Voice control

Voice control
It's going to be tough for S Voice to top Google Now for powerful and speedy voice input, but Samsung is saying that we'll see "enhanced S Voice functionality" with the new Gear.

Onscreen keyboard

Samsung is putting an onscreen keyboard option in the Gear S
With the new Gear's (relatively) spacious screen, Samsung is throwing in native keyboard input. The company says that you'll be able to use it to "instantly reply to messages."
On a 2-in screen, it's hard to imagine typing being anything but a cramped experience – but it's also hard to knock the company for giving us the option. If nothing else, it could come in handy when you're in public and don't want to be heard talking to your wrist, Dick Tracy-style.
Though some developers have announced plans to cook something up, Android Wear isn't yet designed for any kind of keyboard input.

Phone calls

The Gear S makes phone calls, this time without a paired phone
Like previous Gear watches, the Gear S lets you make and take phone calls on your wrist. Unlike those watches, though, the call can now take place without any help from your phone.
Android Wear isn't designed for phone calls – at least not yet.

Heart rate monitor

Both watches have heart rate monitors
LG's original G Watch lacked a heart rate monitor, but with the G Watch R, the company is joining in on the pulse-measuring fun.

Fitness tracking

Fitness tracking
Both watches can track your daily steps in the background, as well as log individual workouts.

Water resistance

Water resistance
Both watches give you IP67 water and dust resistance.

Colors

Color options (at least at launch)
The Gear S will ship in both black and white options, while LG is currently only listing the G Watch R in black.

Swappable band

Both watches have swappable bands
If you aren't a fan of either watch's default band, you'll be able to swap it out for a different one. For the G Watch, it will play nicely with any standard 22 mm strap. Samsung hasn't mentioned the specifics on the Gear S' band, so it's possible it will require a proprietary Samsung-made one.

Camera

Neither watch has a camera
The Galaxy Gear and Gear 2 both had built-in cameras, but Samsung is opting out of that game for the Gear S. As Android Wear isn't currently designed for cameras, the G Watch doesn't have a shooter either.

Battery

Battery capacities
Samsung is estimating an average two days of uptime for the Gear S. LG hasn't mentioned any estimates yet – apart from describing its 410 mAh battery as "durable."
No word yet on the charging method for either watch, but we'd bet on the Gear having a small charging cradle, similar to what we saw on all of the other Gear watches.

Built-in GPS

Built-in GPS
Here's another first for the Gear S, as it has built-in GPS along with turn-by-turn pedestrian navigation, through a service called Here.
The G Watch R will display Google navigation directions from a paired Android phone, but doesn't have any GPS radios built into the watch itself.

Storage

Storage
You probably won't need to worry about this, but both watches list 4 GB of internal storage.

RAM

RAM
Likewise, we're also looking at 512 MB of RAM in each watch.

Processor

Processors
Neither company is getting very specific, but Samsung says that the Gear S has a dual core 1 GHz processor inside. LG lists the Snapdragon 400 for the G Watch R, which probably means the same quad core CPU that we saw in the first G Watch.

Physical buttons

Physical buttons
Right now we're working with limited information, but it looks like each watch has a lone physical button. The Gear S clearly has a small home button beneath its screen, while the G Watch R has a faux winder (which we guess will serve as a power button) on its right side.

Release date

Release dates
We know that the Gear S will roll out starting in October, while the G Watch R will launch in "Q4." That could mean as early as October, but possibly later.

Price

We still don't know what either watch will cost
Unfortunately we don't yet know what either watch will cost. If they follow in the footsteps of their smartwatch predecessors, then we're probably looking at something in the US$200-300 range. But with the 3G capabilities of the Gear and the round display of the G Watch, you never know.
Also keep in mind that, unless Samsung partners with wireless carriers for free mobile data, you'll also need to pay for an extra line of wireless service to use the Gear S without a paired phone.



courtesy by gizmag
Read More

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Five of the best: Budget tablets

Five of the best: Budget tablets


While we tend to hear more about high-end tablets, plenty of manufacturers make great low-cost devices with compelling specs and features. With the tablet market getting more crowded all the time, manufacturers are offering consumers more for their money than ever before. Read on, as we highlight five great options for tablets that won't break the bank.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7.0
Samsung’s latest 7-inch slate offers some good specs for its modest price point, with the device packing a 1.2 GHz quad core processor coupled with a solid 1.5 GB RAM. The tablet runs Android 4.4 KitKat with Samsung’s custom TouchWiz UI, is just 9 mm (0.35 in) thick, and features an attractive design with slim side bezels.
The device's biggest downside is its mediocre 1,200 x 800 display resolution. That translates to 216 pixels per inch (PPI) – a little lower than some of the competition.
If you’re a big reader, then you might want to check out the Nook version of the tablet.
The device retails for US$200.

Google/Asus Nexus 7 (2013)

Google/Asus Nexus 7
The second generation of Google’s Asus-built Nexus 7 tablet is one of the most high-powered devices in this bunch. The 7-inch slate features an impressive 1,920 x 1,200 display, giving it 323 PPI. There’s also 2 GB of RAM on board, as well as optional LTE connectivity.
Unfortunately, there’s no microSD expansion slot like most devices here, meaning you’ll have to make do with the tablet's 16 or 32 GB internal storage.
Prices for the Nexus 7 (2013) start at $230.

Asus Memo Pad 7

Asus Memo Pad 7
The Memo Pad 7 packs a lot of the same internals you’ll find in the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7.0, including the same mid-ranged 1,200 x 800 display. The device runs Android 4.4 KitKat, and while the base model only features 8 GB storage, there’s a microSD card slot on offer.
The Memo Pad 7 is 10 percent thicker than the Samsung slate, and opts for an quad core Intel Atom processor clocked at 1.86 GHz.
Asus’ tablet is priced at $150

Kindle Fire HDX 7

Amazon Kindle Fire HDX
Amazon’s latest 7-inch tablet features the same great 1,920 x 1,200 display resolution as the Nexus 7. It runs on a powerful 2.2 GHz quad core processor and packs 2 GB RAM.
Not only does the device pack solid specs, but it’s also a good option if you’re already tied into Amazon’s content ecosystem. The tablet runs a heavily modified version of Android that Amazon calls Fire OS. The software significantly changes the look and functionality of the device, and puts Amazon content front and center.
The downside here is that you only get access to Amazon’s app store, rather than the Google Play Store. It is possible to side load Android apps, but generally speaking, the app selection is weaker than that found on standard Android and doesn't include any Google-made apps or services.
The Kindle Fire HDX has one other ace up its sleeve in the form of its Mayday button feature, which provides free on-device video tech support.
The 7-inch Amazon Fire HDX tablet retails for $230.

Acer Iconia W4

Acer Iconia W4
While the Iconia W4’s specs might not be anything to shout about, its choice of software makes it worthy of note. While the rest of our tablets run some form of Android, the Iconia opts for Windows 8.1. The choice of OS has some obvious benefits and pitfalls, giving the device full desktop OS functionality on one hand, while being less touchscreen-friendly on the other.
The tablet's internals are solid in most respects. There’s a 1.33 GHz quad core Intel Atom processor, 2 GB RAM, 32 GB internal storage and a microSD card slot. Like many of the tablets in this roundup, the Iconia W4’s screen is its biggest letdown, coming in at 1,280 x 800 over 8-inch, giving it just 189 PPI.
The Acer Iconia W4 is the most expensive device here, with a recommended retail price of $300. However, you can currently pick it up on Amazon for under $200.

Bonus: Tesco Hudl

Tesco Hudl
This 7-inch tablet from UK retailer Tesco is worth a mention due to its on-point specs and low pricing. The Hudl packs a solid 1,440 x 900 resolution display with 242 PPI, coupled with a 1.5 GHz quad core processor, 1 GB RAM and 16 GB of expandable storage.
The company does little to alter the Android experience, and it retails for just £99 ($164). When you consider that electronics prices tend to be a little higher in the UK than they are in the US, the Hudl is a great value option. Unfortunately, it’s only available in the UK.





courtesy by gizmag
Read More

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Alcatel Pop D5

Alcatel Pop D5


General
  • 2G Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
  • 3G Network HSDPA 900 / 2100
  • SIM Micro-SIM
  • Announced 2014, August
  • Status Coming soon. Exp. release 2014, September


Body
  • Dimensions 132.5 x 67.9 x 10 mm (5.22 x 2.67 x 0.39 in)
  • Weight 150 g (5.29 oz)


Display
  • Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
  • Size 480 x 854 pixels, 4.5 inches (~218 ppi pixel density)
  • Multitouch Yes
  • SOUND Alert types Vibration; MP3 ringtones
  • Loudspeaker Yes
  • 3.5mm jack Yes


Memory
  • Card slot microSD, up to 32 GB
  • Internal 4 GB, 512 MB RAM


Data
  • GPRS Yes
  • EDGE Yes
  • Speed HSDPA, 21 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps
  • WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot
  • Bluetooth v4.0, A2DP
  • USB microUSB v2.0


Camera
  • Primary 5 MP, 2592 Ñ… 1944 pixels, LED flash
  • Features Panorama, HDR
  • Video 720p@30fps
  • Secondary VGA


Features 
  • OS Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat)
  • CPU Quad-core 1.3 GHz
  • Sensors Accelerometer
  • Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM
  • Browser HTML
  • Radio FM radio
  • GPS Yes, with A-GPS
  • Java Yes, via Java MIDP emulator
  • Colors Black/White, Platinum Silver, Ash Gray, Volcano Black
  • White, Platinum Silver, Cozy Red, Lemon Yellow, Aqua Blue, Jade Green, Lavender
  •  - SNS integration
  • - MP3/AAC+/WAV player
  • - MP4/H.264/H.263 player
  • - Document viewer
  • - Photo viewer/editor
  • - Organizer
  • - Voice memo/dial
  • - Predictive text input


Battery
  • Li-Ion 1800 mAh battery
  • Stand-by Up to 488 h (2G) / Up to 305 h (3G)
  • Talk time Up to 10 h (2G) / Up to 9 h 30 min (3G)
  • Music play Up to 48 h




by s!non
Read More

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Aquos Crystal from Sharp

Sharp Aquos Crystal

This is a CDMA (code division multiple access ) handset,  it will not work on any GSM network worldwide.

General
  • 2G Network CDMA 800 / 1900
  • 3G Network CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
  • 4G Network LTE
  • SIM Yes
  • Announced 2014, August
  • Status Coming soon. Exp. release 2014, August



Body
  • Dimensions - n/a
  • Weight n/a



Display
  • Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
  • Size 720 x 1280 pixels, 5.0 inches (~294 ppi pixel density)
  • Multitouch Yes



Sound
  • Alert types Vibration, MP3, WAV ringtones
  • Loudspeaker Yes
  • 3.5mm jack Yes
  • Harman Kardon audio enhancement



Memory
  • Card slot TBC
  • Internal 8 GB, 1.5 GB RAM



Data
  • GPRS No
  • EDGE No
  • Speed EV-DO Rev. A, up to 3.1 Mbps; LTE
  • WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band
  • Bluetooth v4.0, A2DP
  • USB micro USB v2.0



Camera
  • Primary 8 MP, 3264 x 2448 pixels, autofocus, LED flash
  • Features Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection
  • Video Yes
  • Secondary 1.2 MP



Features
  • OS Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat)
  • Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
  • CPU Quad-core 1.2 GHz
  • Sensors Accelerometer, proximity, compass
  • Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM
  • Browser HTML5
  • Radio No
  • GPS Yes, with A-GPS
  • Java Yes, via Java MIDP emulator
  • Colors Black, White
  •  - SNS integration
  • - MP3/AAC+/WAV player
  • - MP4/H.263/H.264 player
  • - Organizer
  • - Document viewer/editor
  • - Photo viewer/editor
  • - Voice memo/dial
  • - Predictive text input



Battery
  • Li-Ion 2040 mAh battery
  • Stand-by - n/a
  • Talk time - n/a   






by s!non
Read More

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Budget Smartphones

Five of the best: Budget smartphones



While it’s relatively easy to keep track of key high-end smartphone releases, things get a little more complicated when it comes to low-end handsets. Picking up an affordable, but still capable, handset can be a minefield – but there are a few gems out there. Read on, as Gizmag takes a look at five of the best budget (sub-US$200 off-contract) handsets you can buy in 2014.

Asus Zenfone 4

Asus Zenphone 4
The entry level Zenfone is great if you're looking for a small, stylish smartphone that won't break the bank. The handset's 4-inch display isn't huge, but it is relatively sharp for this category, packing 233 PPI pixels per inch (PPI).
While a 4 GB storage option is standard for low-end devices, the Zenfone's standard 8 GB offers a little more space than most. The handset is also fitted with a microSD card slot, meaning you can easily expand its storage.
Though this is a 2014 device, it doesn't run the latest version of Google's mobile OS, instead making do with Android 4.3 Jelly Bean. That said, Asus has promised a future update to Android 4.4 KitKat. The device is priced at $150 (unsubsidized and off-contract, as all of these prices will be).

Sony Xperia M

Sony Xperia M
The Xperia M was launched in 2013, and while it doesn’t quite excel on the spec sheet, it does come in a fairly thin and light package, measuring just 9.3mm (0.37 in) and weighing 115 g (0.25 lbs).
The device’s 1 GHz quad core processor isn't exactly a speed demon, but most other specs, including 1 GB RAM and a 4-inch 854 x 480 display, are solid. If you’re a fan of Sony’s smartphone stylings, then the Xperia M is a good, wallet-friendly way to get your fix.
Sony originally set the price for the handset at $250, but today you can pick it up for around $150.

Nokia Lumia 635

Nokia Lumia 635
If you’re not a fan of Google’s Android operating system, then you’ll want to take a look at the Windows Phone 8.1-toting Nokia Lumia 635. Microsoft’s mobile operating system uses a significantly different design language to iOS or Android, opting for bright-colored live tiles and clipping text in eye-popping ways.
The handset is thin at 9.2 mm (0.36 in), but the spec sheet is a mixed bag. The Snapdragon 400 processor is solid for a budget device, but it carries just 512 MB RAM, half that of every other handset here.
The display isn't quite as sharp as some of the other devices here, featuring the same 854 x 480 resolution as the Xperia M, but over a more expansive 4.5-inch screen, lowering the pixel density to 218 PPI.
When it comes to connectivity, the Lumia 635 has an ace up its sleeve with the inclusion of an LTE radio – a real plus for a budget handset.
The handset retails for $130.

Motorola Moto E

Motorola Moto E
Motorola has put a lot of effort into the budget smartphone space in the last year, launching two low-cost but capable handsets. The Moto E is the most wallet-friendly of the two, and despite its $130 price tag, it excels in a number of areas.
The first of these is its display. With a resolution of 960 x 540 over 4.3-inches, the screen here isn’t going to win any awards, but a pixel density of 256 PPI is good for the category, and the 1,980 mAh battery should lend the device some solid battery life stats.
Motorola makes almost no changes to stock Android with its Moto devices, meaning that the UI isn’t slowed down by custom graphics – a real bonus for a low-end handset.

Motorola Moto G

Motorola Moto G
You can think of the Moto G as an upgraded Moto E (and vice versa), with the handset packing a more powerful Snapdragon 400 quad core processor (the same one you’ll find in the Lumia 635) and an impressive 4.5-inch, 1,280 x 720 display with 326 PPI. That’s the same pixel density as an iPhone 5s, but the Moto G starts at just $180.
The Moto G also offers the most expansive built-in storage in this bunch, with a choice of either 8 or 16 GB, but there’s no microSD card slot like the rest of the handsets here. The Moto G comes standard with 3G and HSPA 21 Mbps support, but you can also pay $40 extra to buy a version that supports 4G LTE data speeds (known as the Moto G LTE).
Though the Moto G just might be the best option in this group, right now isn't a great time to buy it. Motorola has shot out invitations to a press eventon September 4, where it will likely announce the Moto G2.



courtesy by gizmag
Read More
© underTech All rights reserved | Designed By Seo Blogger Templates |Published By Gooyaabi Templates